SOFT TISSUE AUGMENTATION (SUB-EPITHELIAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT) AROUND PERI-IMPLANT RECESSION – A CASE REPORT

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Arthy Arrvind
Vivek Kumar Sharma
Pramod Kumar Yadav

Abstract

ABSTRACT


Background


Peri-implant soft tissue recession poses a significant challenge in dental implantology, impacting both the aesthetic and functional outcomes of implant-supported restorations. This case report details the management of peri-implant recession through soft tissue augmentation, highlighting the procedural approach and outcomes.


Case Presentation


A 23-year-old female patient presented with peri-implant soft tissue recession around a maxillary implant. Clinical and radiographic assessments indicated insufficient soft tissue volume and improper implant positioning as contributing factors. A connective tissue graft (CTG) was selected to augment the peri-implant mucosa.


Results


Post-operative follow-up at six months demonstrated significant improvement in the peri-implant soft tissue volume and reduction in recession. The augmented tissue remained stable, and the patient reported high satisfaction with the aesthetic and functional outcomes. No complications were observed, and regular follow-ups ensured continued peri-implant health.


Conclusion


This case report underscores the effectiveness of connective tissue grafting in managing peri-implant soft tissue recession. Comprehensive assessment, meticulous surgical technique, and diligent post-operative care were critical to the successful outcome. The findings suggest that soft tissue augmentation is a viable solution for enhancing peri-implant aesthetics and function, warranting further research to establish standardized protocols for broader clinical application.


Keywords


Peri-implant recession, soft tissue augmentation, connective tissue graft, dental implants, aesthetic outcomes.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

CITATION
DOI: 10.53274/IJCRD.2024.5201
Published: 2025-01-07
How to Cite
[1]
A. Arrvind, V. Sharma, and P. Yadav, “SOFT TISSUE AUGMENTATION (SUB-EPITHELIAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT) AROUND PERI-IMPLANT RECESSION – A CASE REPORT”, Ind J Clin Res Dent, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-4, Jan. 2025.

References

  1. Aghazadeh A, Persson RG, Renvert S. Impact of bone defect morphology on the outcome of reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis. Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jun 17;6:33.
  2. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29 Suppl 15:32–49.
  3. Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA, Sculean A. Soft tissue augmentation around osseointegrated and uncovered dental implants: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):53–70.
  4. Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S123-142.
  5. Schneider D, Grunder U, Ender A, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE. Volume gain and stability of peri-implant tissue following bone and soft tissue augmentation: 1-year results from a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):28–37.
  6. Grunder U. Crestal ridge width changes when placing implants at the time of tooth extraction with and without soft tissue augmentation after a healing period of 6 months: report of 24 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Feb;31(1):9–17.